 Printer-friendly version
Printer-friendly version
      
       
      
    
    
  Governor refuses to sign measure with tax/fee increases to avoid deep cuts in
education
Republicans, Democrats trade sharp criticisms
 Senate leader seeks help from federal government to fund public
  works projects and jump start California economy
By Miriam Raftery
  December 23, 2008 (San Diego's East County)--Senate Majority Leader Dean Florez
    (D-Shafter) has written to Henry Paulson, Secretary of the U.S. Treasury
    Department, urging him to use the Treasury's investment strength to jump
    start planned public works projects in California that would provide the
  state with an economic stimulus.
"The frozen bond market and the inability to raise capital in this market
  is a clear and present threat to California's financial health," Florez wrote.  "At
  a time when President-Elect Obama is calling for broad ranging public works
  projects in order to stimulate the economy, California is unable to sell the
  bonds necessary to fund significant public works projects that were already
  in planning. Allowing these projects to stall now will only exacerbate the
  economic downturn and jobs crisis facing California," California's Senate Majority
  leader concluded.
As a result of the budget impasse, the state has announced its intent to shut
  down planned expenditures for infrastructure projects that would have created
  jobs in a struggling California economy.  Those projects include expansion
  of Highway 52 in East County.  
California faces a $42 billion budget shortfall over the next 18 months.  Earlier
  this month, the Legislature sent an $18 billion bill proposing fee increases
  and budget cuts. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger refused to sign the measure. "The
  state is in terrible condition," said the Governor, the Sacramento Bee
  has reported.  Without proper action by legislators, he warned, "We
  are going towards a financial Armageddon."  Schwarzenegger said the
  package passed would raise fees and taxes without making it easier to do business
  in the state or helping troubled homeowners.
Democrats control the Legislature, but a 2/3 majority is required for passage
  of a budget, requiring votes from at least some Republicans.  The Legislature
  has remained at an impasse since July, when passage of a budget was due.  Without
  a resolution, the state could run out of money early next year, legislative
  budget analysts have warned. 
  State Treasurer Bill Locker had urged adoption of the package. "If we
  throw away an $18 billion solution, under these circumstances, investors will
  throw up their hands in disgust, and we likely will suffer the humiliation
  of seeing our credit rating sink even lower," he said in a statement prior
  to Schwarzenegger's rejection of the proposal.
 Republican
Republican
  Assemblyman Joel Anderson, who represents most of East County, has announced
  opposition to legislative Democrats' plan for fee increases to address the
  budget gap.  Anderson favors budget cuts, not fee or tax hikes.   '"Democrats
  have agreed to $6 billion in budget cuts proposed by Republicans. But, instead
  of voting on those cuts and helping California's families, Democrats are handing
  Californians a bill they can't afford to pay and demanding the cash upfront,"
  said Anderson, who called the measure "an outrage" and criticized Democrats
  for "circumventing Constitutional restrictions" to pass new taxes.  Among
  the tax increases included in their plan is a new 39-cent 'highway users fee,'
  which translates into an 18 cent-per-gallon increase at the pump, according
  to a newsletter that Anderson e-mailed to his constituents.  
But Senate President pro Tem Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento) leveled harsh
  criticism of the Republican budget proposal.  "Instead of a serious proposal
  for serious times, the Republican plan relies on phantom revenue that may never
  materialize to the general fund," Steinberg said.  "While they talk a
  lot about California's economic competitiveness, Republicans propose over $10
  billion in cuts to education--the equivalent to shutting down the three largest
  school districts in the state, or over $1,300 a kid. That's no way to build
  for the future."








Recent comments