Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version Share this


By Dave Patterson

November 18, 2013 (San Diego’s East County) – On September 24, the County Board of Supervisors threw their support behind a Southern California drone testing zone.  This rash decision puts San Diego County at risk for $2.7 billion in liability for the property alone if a Drone goes down and starts a fire in the back country.  The County Board of Supervisors need to rethink this position quickly, before the FAA opens our skies to drones for testing purposes, and put us all at risk.

The FAA will decide if Southern California will be the home to drone testing as early as December 2013.  The proposed testing area will cover virtually all of Southern California and Western Nevada.  While the FAA says that the drone manufacturers will be responsible for liability, realistically no business can afford $2.7 billion in property liability insurance, and nor can the County.  A catastrophic fire in San Diego County caused by a drone crash would surely bankrupt the County for the foreseeable future.

The latest wildfire risk assessment shows that more than 16,000 structures are at high risk of burning.  In the Core Logic report, the potential for burning is a scale of 0~100, where 100 is extremely high.  In San Diego County 16,000 structures have a rating of 81~100, with value assigned as $2.7 billion.  See page 26 of this report.

As reported by the UT, SDG&E has already paid $2 billion in damages from the Witch Creek fire.  Can we assume that the County can afford the litigation alone?

Supervisors Dianne Jacob and Ron Roberts, who support the drone testing area because of the potential for jobs, need to ask where the people will work if their homes and businesses are burned out because of a drone crash?  Aside from liability, there are many other questions that need to be answered regarding the rights of the people to be free from the noise and intrusion into their privacy.  What sensors will be tested on these drones and what happens to the data recorded?  Can we expect to see our family backyard picnics on YouTube soon?

Clearly the decision to support the drone testing area was not well thought out.  The County Board of Supervisors must temporarily withdraw the County’s support for the drone testing area until the idea can be thoroughly researched and public input provided.

On December 4th, a small group of people who call themselves the Back Country Voices will address these issues in Julian.  The County Supervisors need to be there.

Dave Patterson is a member of the Back Country Voices, and San Diego Veterans For Peace.  Veterans For Peace has been protesting against the miss-use of Drone Technology for more than a year.  The views in this editorial reflect the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of East County Magazine.  To submit an editorial for consideration, contact

Error message

Support community news in the public interest! As nonprofit news, we rely on donations from the public to fund our reporting -- not special interests. Please donate to sustain East County Magazine's local reporting and/or wildfire alerts at to help us keep people safe and informed across our region.



Concerned residents of San Diego County have joined together to form a citizens action group, ‘Back Country Voices.’ They have scheduled an additional public outreach and education meeting to address drone testing in the back country.

Town Hall Meeting: Dec. 4th, 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. at the Julian Town Hall/Community Center. Julian, CA. 92036

Residents of San Diego were given very little information and notice about this proposal. There were no public forums, no opportunities for public input, nor any venue to voice concerns regarding what’s at stake for testing drones in our county.

In response to questions and concerns about domestic drones, ‘BCV’ has invited members of the FAA, ACLU, the Cal UAS Portal team, Bill of Rights Defense Committee, law enforcement, S.D. Veterans for Peace Foundation, State and local officials, Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen), environmentalist, firefighters, and others.

We love the back country of San Diego, that’s why we live here!

Sure, we might make some sacrifices that city living has to offer; there are few employment opportunities here, higher gas prices, food, heat, etc., but we choose to live here for some very fundamental reasons; smaller school sizes, very low crime, it’s absolutely beautiful, we know our neighbors and can count on our community. What more could you ask for?

Should we exchange the treasures of our Constitutional Rights, safety, privacy, and potential environmental hazards, for a “testing” ground for drones?
Is this the world you want your kids to live in?

No rights? No choice? No Voice?

While drones have proven beneficial for scientific purposes, Americans need to weigh these benefits against the very real threat drones bring to the rights we have been granted by the Constitution.  If we allow the government to strip us of our Rights how much farther will they go?

Informed citizens are truly the strength of a democracy.

Please join us and share your voice!


Back Country Voices Website

Back Country Voices’ Facebook group

You can also follow us on Twitter