Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version Share this
“Leaving women in the dark about their healthcare and restricting doctors from providing candid advice is simply not in the best interest of public health.” – California Attorney General Xavier Becerra  
By Miriam Raftery
February 25, 2020 (San Francisco) – By a 7-4 vote, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals yesterday ruled that federal Title X funds for family planning can be blocked to any clinics that provide abortion referrals, even if they don’t perform abortions.  
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra called the ruling troubling” adding, “The gag rule interferes with healthcare decisions that should remain between women and their healthcare providers. This reckless rule is just another attempt by the Trump-Pence administration to roll back women’s access to reproductive healthcare.”
The Title X program serves low-income women, young people, families, and others.  “Leaving women in the dark about their healthcare and restricting doctors from providing candid advice is simply not in the best interest of public health,” Becerra says.  
The gag rule prevents doctors and other healthcare providers which receive Title X funds from even advising women in high-risk pregnancies about pregnancy termination services that could save a mother’s life. Even a woman carrying a non-viable fetus, such as one with no brain stem, cannot be told about options to end the pregnancy. Nor can a rape victim or a woman with a unintended pregnancy for any reason be provided a morning after pill, abortion, or even information on where else to obtain such services. 
The formerly liberal Ninth Circuit appellate court has become markedly more conservative with President Donald Trump’s recent appointment of judges. 
Today’s ruling fulfills a campaign pledge made by Trump to cut off federal funding related to abortion, a nod to the religious beliefs of his Evangelical base. 
Planned Parenthood has opted out of Title X funding, which had provided around $60 million a year to the national chain of family planning cinics, rather than be forced to withhold medical information or services from patients. The clinic now relies on funding from other sources.  But for smaller clinics without deep-pocket donors, some may have little choice but to stop providing counseling or abortion services to all of their patients. 
A copy of the decision can be viewed here.

Error message

Support community news in the public interest! As nonprofit news, we rely on donations from the public to fund our reporting -- not special interests. Please donate to sustain East County Magazine's local reporting and/or wildfire alerts at to help us keep people safe and informed across our region.


1st Amendment, Common Sense, Basic Human Decency

The decision to support the Trump administration's policy to withhold funding for even discussing options doesn't surprise me. My undergraduate degree was a joint major of Social Psychology and Political Science, including three courses in Constitutional Law. Since then I've read dozens of books and hundreds of articles. To my dismay i found that Federal Court decisions, especially the Supreme Court, have historically ignored the Constitution, especially the Bill of Rights, the vast majority of the time, deciding either in favor of corporations and/or government vs individual's and groups. Not wishing to fund a particular medical intervention is one thing; but muzzling speech is another.

As for common sense and basic human decency, when a fetus is severely deformed, resulting eventually in a stillbirth or severe birth defects that will lead to death in a short time or a life-time of pain, suffering, and/or severe disabilities OR to literally put the mother's health at risk, including risk of death, goes against common sense, compassion, any type of humanity. While I totally disagree with Trump's position on choice, he could at least allow doctors to advise women in the aforementioned cases. But, that wouldn't be Trump.

See also my Reader's Editorial: Abortion is a 1st Amendment Issue at: