Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version Share this

June 11, 2009 (San Diego’s East County) – Carrie Prejean, a senior at San Diego Christian College in El Cajon, has been dethroned as Miss California USA. Her turbulent reign, which weathered revelations of topless photos and a controversy over her statements opposing gay marriage, came to an end over the beauty queen’s alleged refusal to honor commitments for public appearances on behalf of the pageant. Her saga sparked controversy both locally and nationally. Here in East County and San Diego, community leaders say the Prejean controversy raises issues not only about her conduct, but about the conduct of pageant officials—and pressures imposed on teen beauty contestants.


“This was a decision based solely on contract violations, including Ms. Prejean’s unwillingness to make appearances on behalf of the Miss California USA organization,” said state pageant executive director Keith Lewis. Pageant owner Donald Trump was involved in the decision to fire Prejean, CNN News has reported. Runner-up Tami Farrell, Miss Malibu, will replace prejean as Miss California USA.


Mary England, who has organized pageants including the Miss La Mesa pageant, made these observations.. “The young girls of today and the pageant ladies of tomorrow need to read all the fine print of the pageant, understand what they are getting into and then make an informed decision before they run for Miss California. Being Miss California is not any different than being an employee of a company - you need to understand the rules and obligations of the job - then abide by them.”


She added, “ Whether you have a high profile job as Miss California or a "regular"job as the majority of the world - you need to fulfill all of the obligations that are expected of you. If Miss California did not fulfill all of the obligations - refusing to show up at public appearances, etc. then Miss California did not fulfill the obligations of her "contract" as Miss California.” But she added, “There are always two sides to every story - so none of us know what has really transpired, internally between Miss California and the people that govern the pageant...The message that this should send is: No matter what job you have in life - there will be challenges with that job - do the job to the best of your ability, complete all of your tasks and responsibilities related to that job and be the best person you can be!”


Prejean did not respond to an interview request from ECM.  She first drew national controversy when pageant judge Perez Hilton asked her opinion on legalization of same-sex marriage. “Well, I think it’s great that Americans are able to choose one way or the other. We live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite marriage,” Prejean replied. She added, “ I do believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman, no offense to anybody out there. But that’s how I was raised …”


A second controversy ensued after pageant officials admitted to paying for breast augmentation surgery for Prejean in preparation for the Miss USA World competition. In addition, a series of revealing photos released on the Internet from lingerie shoots done by Prejean, a model, sparked further heated debate. Pageant rules ask contestants to disclose if they have posed for any semi-nude photos, which would be grounds for disqualification.


Prejean blamed photos showing her topless on the wind blowing her vest aside during a modeling shoot; the photographer disputed her story and said the shots were posed. Prejean also claimed photos were made while she was a minor; Victoria’s Secret countered that the lingerie line shown was not manufactured until after her 18th birthday. While some in the Christian community defended Prejean, others contended that her actions made her an inappropriate spokesperson for groups that promoted “family values.”


Despite those controversies, Trump determined in May that Prejean could keep her crown. However, the pageant producer, K-2, announced today that it decided to terminate her contract for “continued breach of contract issues.” Prejean has starred in a TV ad opposing gay marriage after winning her crown (despite a prohibition on outside appearances) but has reportedly failed to meet her official pageant appearance obligations.


“This is like watching a train wreck in slow motion, isn’t it?” observed Doug Deane, education committee chairman for the San Diego East County Chamber of Commerce, when the scandals surrounding Prejean became known. “I get the strong sense that Carrie Prejean’s life is not her own, and that she has been, and is still being manipulated by those whose concern for her career and well-being is not their highest priority.” He noted that Prejean answered Hilton’s question honestly, “knowing there might be a price for doing so. That’s something that should be admired, no matter how we feel about her answer.”


England, in an interview conducted at the time of the marriage question controversy, faulted pageant officials for turning the event into a political hot potato. “Pageant officials should ask questions that are relevant—views on same sex marriage or other politically charged issues seem to me to be out of that realm,” she told East County Magazine when the controversy first erupted. Questions may legitimately test how a contestant “thinks on her feet” and assess the contestant’s views for purposes of determining whether she will be an appropriate role model at community events, England believes. “But she observed, “Rallies for same sex marriage or against same sex marriages I bet would not be on her calendar. Hence, why the question?”


But she added, “I believe that each candidate in any public contest has a right to her or his opinions. This is America. We should never be judged because we do not believe with the norm.”


Steve Whitburn, past president of the San Diego Democratic Club and a supporter of gay rights, had a different view. “If they think asking political questions will make the show more entertaining and draw more viewers, then that’s what they’ll do,” he noted. “I think it’s important to stand up for what you believe, and I don’t fault her for that.”


Whitburn also defended the reactions of audience members, including some who booed Prejean’s response on gay marriage. “If your viewpoint is that I shouldn’t have the same rights that you do, then I’m certainly offended by that.” But he added, “I do hope that she will become more accepting and come to understand that there’s no good reason why a loving gay couple shouldn’t be able to enjoy marriage just like anyone else.”


England drew this conclusion. “I believe this has been made to be a huge media story, rather than the story that it is - we have a person that has been outspoken, in the limelight and has been given a huge media opportunity in life,” she observed. “ How she used that media opportunity is her decision. The pageant and the public need to move on."


Error message

Local news in the public interest is more important now than ever, during the COVID-19 crisis. Our reporters, as essential workers, are dedicated to keeping you informed, even though we’ve had to cancel fundraising events. Please give the gift of community journalism by donating at https://www.eastcountymedia.org/donate.


The end of beauty pageants?

Carrie's firing is based on "contract violations", which her lawyer indicates are unjustified. The pageant will not justify their actions. Mary England blames Carrie - "read the fine print" and warns all future participants.

The warning needs to say “don’t say anything politically incorrect”, even if it is the same position that the president takes on gay marriage.

Carrie has expressed her regret over several internet photos, but the media cannot let that go. Isn’t it possible that a person can apologize and be forgiven? Not if you are Carrie.

Most beauty contestants come from families with similar views on marriage. Where does that leave these potential participants? You must embrace gay marriage if you want to compete. That’s an interesting choice. I predict fewer participants. Why dump thousands of dollars into the pageant when there are so many other wholesome activities and sports that don’t force you to affirm views you oppose?

Actually Mary and many others supported Prejean

when she was merely being criticized for voicing a politically divisive opinion (myself included, as a staunch advocate of free speech). I disagree that she was asked to step down because of her answer. If the judges found her answer so offensive, why was she awarded the crown to start with? It would make no sense to name her winner, then ask her to resign for an answer she gave.

Do you not think a pageant entrant should obey the written rules they sign before entering? There is nothing in there about opinions. But the rules do say you're not supposed to have posed semi-nude and that winners are obligated to make a certain number of appearances for the pageant when asked. Of course someone should be able to decline an objectionable appearance, but Prejean did not help her cause by essentially thumbing nose at pageant officials by failing to honor her contractual obligation to represent the pageant in a significant number of public events--even after they bent over backwards to keep her on despite the photo flap. By failing to show up at numerous appearances, she gave ammunition to any who may have been looking for a reason to oust her and lost support even among some who stood by her before.

Had she simply shown up to most of her appearances, she would likely still have her crown and be off to compete in the Miss USA pageant.

While she apologized for the photos, the point is that pageants like to project a wholesome image for young girls, and there's a reasonable argument to be made for showing other kids that there are consequences to one's actions. If you are untruthful about rules you've broken, what message does it send to other contestants if no action is taken? It would be different if the pageant had no such contract; in that case an apology for using poor judgment in the past would be adequate in most people's book. Other pageant winners have been stripped of crowns in the past when revealing photos were discovered, so this would not have been a precedent had they done so here. If anything she may have gotten a free pass on the photo issue, because the pageant didn't want to be accused of retaliating over the gay marriage answer. But if she repeatedly refused to show up for appearances, why shouldn't the pageant then be forgiven for asking a runner-up who is enthusiastic to represent the pageant to step up and do so?

I wonder if they'll tone down the divisive nature of the questions. I don't recall such questions being asked years ago and really don't see why we need to know a beauty contestant's political views.

Beauty pagents now stink!

After this episode I will never watch another Beauty pagent in my life.

Carrie Prejean was asked her opinion, she gave it, and then
she was attacked.
How stupid.