East County News Service
June 29, 2014 (San Diego)--The San Diego ACLU has filed suit against top immigration officials for unconstitutionally preventing a born-and-raised U.S. citizen from returning to the United States from Mexico. Like Joseph K. in Franz Kafka’s novel The Trial, Oscar Olivas, a 45-year-old natural-born U.S. citizen, has been detained but does not know why. He is unable to access the court before which he stands accused, and has not been allowed to view any evidence used against him.
The lawsuit was filed in federal court in San Diego, naming the port director of Calexico, the San Diego field director of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and Secretary of State John Kerry. The suit asks the court to allow Olivas to return to the United States, declare that he is a United States citizen, and affirm that the order exiling him violated the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment.
According to the ACLU, Olivas was unlawfully exiled to Mexico in 2011 and has been trying for three years to convince Customs and Border Protection that if he would be allowed a hearing before a judge, he could prove he is a U.S. citizen and return to his home and work.
Gabriela Rivera, an attorney for the ACLU in San Diego County, said that in preventing Mr. Olivas from returning to his home country, the government has unlawfully disregarded both the practical and constitutional meaning of citizenship. “The Supreme Court ruled nearly a century ago that a U.S. citizen facing removal must be allowed judicial review to determine his citizenship status,” the lawyer stated.
Olivas’s nightmare began in August 2011 when he tried to return to the United States from Mexico as he had done numerous times in the past without incident. Border Patrol agents refused to allow him to cross the border. They disregarded the proof he carried with him—a birth certificate, Social Security card, and a California driver’s license.
According to the ACLU’s lawsuit, the Border Patrol seems to have relied solely on a false statement that consular officials coerced from Olivas’s mother in December 2010. The officers exiled Mr. Olivas to Mexico and told him he would have to argue his citizenship claim in front of a judge, but apparently the officers never referred his case to any court, depriving him of an opportunity to return to his home country.
Olivas was born in the San Gabriel Valley in Los Angeles County in 1969, the ACLU case states. His mother was an undocumented immigrant, though she later became a U.S. citizen. Fearful of giving birth in a hospital , she delivered Olivas at home with the assistance of a midwife. Births in private residences were not uncommon at the time. At an early check-up, a doctor advised that she register Olivas’s birth with the county. Olivas’s mother registered his birth when he was five months old and received a birth certificate from the county. Mr. Olivas also has a certificate of baptism, a Social Security card, and a state-issued driver’s license, all of which corroborate that he was born in the United States.
In 2009, he began the process of applying for an immigrant visa—a “Green Card”—for his wife and step-son based on his status as a U.S. citizen. This process can take months or years and required Olivas’s wife and stepson to live in Mexico while their applications were pending.
The Olivas family planned to stay together in Mexicali, which would allow Mr. Olivas to cross the border for work, and his U.S. citizen daughter to attend school in the United States and receive treatment for her speech and language impairment.
His wife was interviewed at the U.S. Consulate in Juarez, Mexico, as part of her visa application process. A consular official told her that they would need to interview Mr. Olivas’s mother as well. So in December 2010, Olivas’ mother traveled to the consulate.
There she was confronted by three officers who told her that they believed her son’s birth certificate was fraudulent, the ACLU suit contends. One of the officers threatened that she would lose her citizenship and be prosecuted for fraudulently obtaining a birth certificate unless she admitted that Olivas was born in Mexico. She felt intimidated and feared she would be detained and so after several hours, she signed a pre-typed declaration, which she could not read and which was not read to her.
Mr. Olivas and his family are now suffering extreme emotional and financial distress in Mexico. Because he is not a Mexican citizen, he cannot work in Mexico to support his family. Olivas’s young daughter, a U.S. citizen, does not receive the special education and language and speech therapy she requires and which she would receive in the United States. Both dearly miss their home country.
The ACLU’s lawyer says that Mr. Olivas’s unlawful expulsion was not an innocent mistake by immigration enforcement officers. Instead, he contends, it was the consequence of a system that relies on “racial and ethnic stereotypes, empowers officers to act as judge, jury and executioner, and all but prohibits affected individuals from seeking judicial review”
The ACLU attorney concludes, “A judge should determine citizenship, not an immigration enforcement officer. The Government must prioritize preserving the liberty and security of its citizens to remain within their homeland.”