STATE WANTS TO RELEASE SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATOR WAKEFIELD AS TRANSIENT; SUP. ANDERSON LAUNCHES PETITION TO OPPOSE RELEASE

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version Share this

Update November 21, 2024 -- Today Judge Campos approved releasing Wakefield as a transient, despite 800 signatures on a petition opposing this release.

By Miriam Raftery

November 18, 2024 (San Diego) —After three failed attempts to place sexually violent predator Merle Wakefield at homes run by Liberty Healthcare in Borrego Springs, Mt. Helix and Poway, the California Department of State Hospitals now proposes to release Wakefield as a transient.

Supervisor Joel Anderson has launched a petition for the public to sign opposing Wakefield’s release. Wakefield’s placement will be determined by a hearing November 20 before Judge Yvonne Campos.

 

Wakefield, 67, was convicted of lewd acts on a child in 1981 and violent rape in 1990. He served time in prison and underwent treatment in a state hospital. Diagnosed as a sexually violent predator likely to reoffend, he has been proposed for release locally three times. A judge rejected a proposed placement in the Mt. Helix area; later the state withdrew proposed placement in Borrego Springs and asked that Wakefield undergo additional treatment. A proposed placement of Wakefield in Poway was also withdrawn from the state following a public outcry.

 

In a letter to Judge Campos, Supervisor Anderson wrote, “As you may be aware, DSH and their contractor, Liberty Healthcare, has targeted the East County communities I represent as their dumping ground for SVPs. Despite the negative impact these placements have had on our communities, the proposed transient release of an SVP is even more concerning for my constituents. The release of SVP Wakefield, without confining him to a specific location where he can be closely monitored, will result in a reduced level of oversight than SVPs conditionally placed in a residence.

 

Anderson’s letter revealed, “An audit of DSH’s Sexually Violent Predator Conditional Release Program, completed by the California State Legislature’s Legislative Audit Committee this month, found that fourpercent of SVPs participating in DSH’s Conditional Release Program reoffended after their release and nineteen percent of nonparticipating SVPs reoffended.

 

In light of the numerous heinous offenses committed by SVPs, transient releases that would prevent an effective oversight process to track and monitor SVPs should be rejected by the courts. Accordingly,I respectfully ask that you fully deny the request by DSH for the transient release of SVP Wakefield.

 

San Diego County has 4,207 square miles, yet zero sexually violent predators have been released into supervisorial districts 1, 3, or 4. Wakefield’s release in Poway, the latest failed state placement effort, would have resulted in 70% of the SVPs currently in our region being placed in Anderson’s district 2, with the rest in Supervisor Jim Desmond’s district 5.


Error message

Support community news in the public interest! As nonprofit news, we rely on donations from the public to fund our reporting -- not special interests. Please donate to sustain East County Magazine's local reporting and/or wildfire alerts at https://www.eastcountymedia.org/donate to help us keep people safe and informed across our region.

Comments

Also:

After a sex crime has been done, the long term affects on the victims can be devastating, even insurmountable. Family members are also emotionally damaged as well.

I agree with others. We can't

I agree with others. We can't roll the dice with our kids by releasing these men back into society. They had their chance to live peacefully with others and they took advantage of our most vulnerable, scarring these kids for life. It's far too risky to ever release these men and give them an opportunity to reoffend.

San Diego County District Attorney:

The prospect of sexual predators in our midst is difficult to accept. However, the reality is that we have approximately 4,500 known sex registrants in our county at any point in time.

Recidivism

Rates vary, but there is zero chance of a 100 percent "cure", especially for child sex offenders who are likely to reoffend in time. I believe the risk is far too great for a release into society - ever... This applies to all sex offenders, of every type. It's might be more cost effective to keep them incarcerated, versus being housed offsite, while being monitored living in a place where the homeowner is making a lot of money renting to a government agency. Many of these "landlords" house a number of sex offenders, usually 2 per room. Society should not be subjected to these deviants. Safety risks are obvious, as is the depreciated value of surrounding homes. Tax dollars should be spent better.