Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version Share this


East County News Service

December 8, 2016 (Santa Barbara) -- Two conservation organizations have filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court to protect fragile habitat and rare species in the path of a massive, remote fuel break recently approved in the Los Padres National Forest. The suit is also an effort to encourage the Los Padres National Forest to focus on reducing fire risk where it matters most, directly in and around communities.

The Gaviota Fuel Break would clear-cut native chaparral habitat across a six-mile-long, 300-foot-wide swath (the length of a football field) between Refugio Pass and Gaviota Peak, along the crest of the Santa Ynez Mountains. The site – located far away from any structures – lies at the heart of the Gaviota Coast, one of the crown jewels of Santa Barbara County.

The Forest Service’s experts consistently state that the best way to protect communities from wildfire is to create defensible space immediately around structures, and to construct and retrofit homes with fire-safe materials. But according to the lawsuit, remote fuel breaks, such as the one at issue in this case, are an inefficient way to reduce fire risk. In fact, the Forest Service ranks the Gaviota Fuel Break project with a low priority score of 84 out of a total of 163 fuel breaks in the Forest.

“Creating a 300-foot-wide, six-mile-long habitat clearance zone in an area far from any community is a waste of taxpayer dollars, an ineffective way to reduce fire risk, and an unnecessary destruction of nature,” said Richard Halsey, director of the California Chaparral Institute. “The science is clear. The Forest Service needs to focus its fire prevention efforts directly within and around communities at risk, not in faraway locations known for their spectacular natural beauty.”

The key species that will be seriously threatened by the Gaviota Fuel Break is the Refugio manzanita (Arctostaphylos refugioensis). Considered “endangered” by the California Native Plant Society, the classic icon of the chaparral only grows in a narrow ridgeline band between Point Conception and Santa Ynez Peak along the coast of Santa Barbara County – exactly where the Gaviota Fuel Break is scheduled to run. The fuel break would cut through some of manzanita’s largest populations.

“In rushing to approve this project, the Forest Service has failed to take simple steps to protect one of the rarest manzanita species on Earth,” said Jeff Kuyper, executive director of Los Padres ForestWatch, a conservation organization based in Santa Barbara that works to protect rare plants and animals throughout the Los Padres National Forest. “The Refugio manzanita is too important to sacrifice for an ineffective, expensive fuel break that is far-removed from communities.”

When the Forest Service initially announced the project in 2014, officials indicated they would carefully examine ways to avoid negative impacts by preparing an Environmental Assessment. But the agency suddenly reversed course in 2015. Ignoring previous collaborative efforts with conservation groups and scientists, the agency determined the project was excluded from environmental review, opponents note. The decision was based on the claim that the project was a “timber stand improvement.” But there is no merchantable timber in the area,  the environmental groups state.

In the lawsuit, the groups – Los Padres ForestWatch and the California Chaparral Institute – ask the court to order the Forest Service to conduct the proper level of environmental analysis under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of the Gaviota Fuel Break before it can proceed and to implement the project consistent with the Los Padres Forest Plan.

“The Forest Service cannot stretch the language of their NEPA categorical exclusions like taffy,” said Nina Robertson, an attorney with Earthrise Law Center who is representing the groups filing the lawsuit. “An exclusion for timber stand improvement does not cover construction of multiple fuel breaks in areas with no timber and where those fuel breaks are destroying the important chaparral ecosystem and the rare and sensitive species that exist there.”

Error message

Support community news in the public interest! As nonprofit news, we rely on donations from the public to fund our reporting -- not special interests. Please donate to sustain East County Magazine's local reporting and/or wildfire alerts at to help us keep people safe and informed across our region.


Gaviota Fuel Break

These fuel breaks are not effective at stopping major fires based on past history. This will bring in exotic plants and weeds not already there competing with native vegetation and possibly increasing flammability. Chaparral is a well suited natural cover providing watershed protection, wildlife and rare species habitat. To think this is being done as a Federal Categorical Exclusion is a great attempt at not addressing potential environmental impacts. Good for agency budgets and employment. Not good for the environment.


...the majority of the Chaparral is Adenostoma fasciculatum (chamise or greasewood).
This is the stuff that burns like a dead Christmas tree. All of that aside why do the nut cases think clearing 300 feet of this stuff is going to make one cent of difference to the ecosystem? If it prevents a fire from getting bigger you have protected the majority of your Chaparral. In a Santa Anna driven wild fire it's all going to burn, 300 foot fuel brake or not. We watched the 03 fires sweep across I8 in Alpine without slowing down. In a non wind driven fire the 300 foot clear will give the firefighters a chance of stopping the fire away from populated areas. Anyway, nothing I say will make a difference and nothing Halsey says will make a difference. The people in charge of our forests will do what they think is the best for the long term health of our forests and a lawsuit from fringe groups won't make a difference either. Meanwhile it will costs taxpayers more $ to take care of the nuisance lawsuits than to cut the fire brake.

Richard Halsey, director of the California Chaparral Institute.. a certified nut case. Chaparral is a junk plant. The only way to kill it is to dig it out by the roots. Look at anywhere there has been a fire in the San Diego east county. Within 3 years there grows tall and real healthy Chaparral. Halsey and his nut case buddies need to let the professionals do their job.