Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version Share this


By Miriam Raftery

Updated with analysis from Forbes Magazine.

November 19, 2017 (San Diego) – House Republicans rammed through passage of a sweeping tax reform measure without holding a single hearing on the 400-page bill and without allowing any input from Democrats.   The measure, hailed as the first major legislative victory for President Donald Trump, was opposed by San Diego’s three Democratic representatives as well as by Republican Darrell Issa, but was supported by Republican Duncan Hunter. 

A new report by the Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation reveals that the Senate version of the bill would ultimately raise taxes on Americans under $75,000 by 2027 and would raise taxes starting in 2021 on those earning $10,000 to $30,000, offering only limited short-term savings such as an increased childcare credit, but long-term losses for low and middle-income Americans.

 It would also increase the federal deficit to over $1.5 trillion over the next ten years, the New York Times reports. Approximately 80 percent of the tax cuts would go to corporations, businesses and the wealthy, the San Diego Union-Tribune reports. The measure would take away popular tax credits such as deductions for state and local taxes paid.  It lowers taxes on the highest income earners from 39.6 to 38.5 percent and dramatically slashes corporate taxes from 35 percent to 20 percent starting in 2019.

Next up the measure goes to the Senate, where it has already passed a key committee. The Senate version has a major addition – mandating repeal of the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, despite repeal of the ACA failing to win passage repeatedly as a stand-alone measure.  Another key change is tax cuts for individuals would be temporary under the Senate plan for ten years, while cuts would be permanent under the House version.

Forbes has a detailed breakdown comparing many aspects of both bills:

Trump hailed passage of the House measure.  “Congratulations to the House of Representatives for passing the #TaxCutsandJobsAct — a big step toward fulfilling our promise to deliver historic TAX CUTS for the American people by the end of the year!“ he tweeted.

Hunter has called the House bill a “once in a generation” shot to boost the economy and fix a tax code he sees as flawed.  But he concedes, “This legislation is not perfect,” the San Diego Union-Tribune reports. Hunter would prefer higher caps for mortgage income deduction to allow for high property costs here in California. 

Issa echoed Hunter’s concern on that point, but voted against the bill.

But at least two of Hunter’s opponents in the 2018 election have sharply criticized his stance.  Democrat Ammar Campa-Najjar posted on his Facebook page: “Hunter Jr. has abandoned taxpayers and has brought national shame to our district. Who does this hurt?  The sick, the disabled, the elderly, homeowners, students, teachers, everyone but the wealthy. We deserve better, and are better than Duncan Hunter Jr.”

Josh Butner, also a Democrat, posted on his Facebook page after the Nov. 16 vote, “Today, Duncan Hunter turned his back on his constituents and sided with big corporations. Rather than putting the middle class and small businesses first, Duncan Hunter voted to increase taxes on working families and stick our children with the bill so they can pay for cuts for corporations that working families should have received. The people of California’s 50th Congressional District deserve better!”

Among San Diego County’s other representatives, Democrat Susan Davis faulted Republican leadership for failing to cooperate with Democrats to find a bipartisan solution that would be “fairer to the American people who deserve to keep more of their hard-earned dollars.”

Juan Vargas, also a Democrat, stated, “Working families in my district will see their taxes increase with the elimination of essential deductions, including the personal exemption deduction, the student loan deduction, the medical expense deduction and even the educator expense deduction.”

Democrat Scott Peters, a former tax attorney, said the tax code is outdated and has loopholes that need to be reduced, also calling the international tax system noncompetitive. But he voiced concerns about the House bill increasing the national debt and said it would harm the economy, the Union-Tribune reports.

But the most scathing criticism came not from Democrats, but from the normally staid and conservative Forbes business magazine. 

Forbes article states, "There's no economic justification whatsoever for a tax cut at this time. U.S. GDP is growing, unemployment is close to 4 percent (below what is commonly considered "full employment, corporate profits are at record levels and stock markets are soaring. It makes no sense to add any federal government-induced stimulus to all this private sector-caused economic activity, let alone a tax cut as big as this one."

The Forbes analysis continues, "This is actually the ideal time for Washington to be doing the opposite. But by damning the economic torpedoes and moving full-speed ahead, House and Senate Republicans and the Trump White House are setting up the U.S. for the modern-day analog of the inflation-producing guns-and-butter economic policy of the Vietnam era. The GOP tax bill will increase the federal deficit by $2 trillion or more over the next decade (the official estimates of $1.5 trillion hide the real amount with a witches brew of gimmicks and outright lies) that, unless all the rules have changed, is virtually certain to result in inflation and much higher interest rates than would otherwise occur.  The GOP's insanity is compounded by its moving ahead without having any idea of what this policy will actually do to the economy. The debates in the Ways and Means and Senate Finance Committees and on the House floor all took place before the Congressional Budget Office's analysis and, if it really exists, the constantly-promised-but-never-seen report from the Treasury on the economics of this tax bill."

A Senate vote could come right after the Thanksgiving holidays. Critics contend Republicans are trying to ram through the measure before opponents can mobilize. But passage in the Senate is not a slam-dunk.  Republicans can afford to lose only two GOP votes, and at least one Republican Senator has already announced opposition.

If a Senate bill passes, it could then require reconciliation with the House version, after which a final measure would go to President Trump, who is expected to sign.

If you wish to reach your Senator or Congressional member to voice your views, here are their contacts:


Kamala Harris (D)


Washington D.C.: Phone (202) 224 - 3553

San Diego: Phone (619) 239 - 3884; Fax (202) 228 - 3863

San Diego office:600 B St., Suite 2240, San Diego, CA 92101-4604


Diane Feinstein (D)


Washington D.C.:   phone (202) 224-3841; fax (202) 228-3954         

San Diego: (619) 231-9712 phone; (619) 231-1108 fax



49th District – Daryl Issa (R)


Washington:  Phone (202) 225-3906; fax (202) 225-3303

Vista:  Phone (760) 599-5000; fax (760) 599-1178


District office: 1800 Thibodo Road, #310 Vista, CA 92083


50th District – Duncan Hunter (R)


Washington D.C.  Phone: 202-225-5672 Fax: 202-225-0235

El Cajon:  Phone: 619-448-5201 Fax: 619-449-2251

District office:  1611 Magnolia Ave., Suite 310 El Cajon, CA 92020


51st District -  Juan Vargas (D)


Washington D.C. Phone: 202-225-8045 Fax: 202-225-9073

San Diego Phone: 619-422-5963 Fax: 619-422-7290

District office:  333 F Street, #A Chula Vista, CA 91910-2624


52nd District -- Scott Peters (D)


2410 Rayburn House Office Bldg. Washington, DC 20515

Phone: 202-225-0808 Fax: 202-225-2558

4350 Executive Drive, Suite 105 San Diego, CA 92122

 Phone: 858-455-5550


53rd District:  Susan Davis (D)


Washington: Phone: (202) 225-2040; Fax: (202) 225-2948

San Diego:  Phone: (619) 280-5353; Fax: (619) 280-5311

District office: 2700 Adams Avenue, #102 San Diego, CA 92116


Don’t know who your Congressional representative is?  Type in your zip code at this link to find out:

Error message

Support community news in the public interest! As nonprofit news, we rely on donations from the public to fund our reporting -- not special interests. Please donate to sustain East County Magazine's local reporting and/or wildfire alerts at to help us keep people safe and informed across our region.