EAGLE DEATHS WILL INCREASE DUE TO FEDERAL RULE CHANGE BENEFITTING WIND INDUSTRY, AMERICAN BIRD CONSERVANCY CHARGES

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version Share this

 

April 13, 2012 (Washington D.C.) -- The American Bird Conservancy (ABC), the nation’s leading bird conservation organization, has charged that the eagle rule change proposed today by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) will result in more eagles being killed at wind energy projects.

 

“ABC supports wind power when it is bird-smart, but this proposed rule change will lead to more dead eagles, more costly lawsuits, and more Americans who will wonder why the wind industry keeps getting a free pass to kill some of our nation’s most iconic birds,” said Kelly Fuller, ABC’s Wind Campaign Coordinator.

 
Currently, wind energy companies and other businesses can apply to FWS for permit that allows them to kill limited numbers of eagles as part of their normal operations if they also commit to a series of compensatory actions to offset this damage. These “programmatic incidental take permits” granted under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act must be renewed every five years. However, at the request of the wind energy industry, FWS has now proposed making the permits good for 30 years.
 
“It is simply irresponsible of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to propose granting 30-year take permits for birds such as eagles, which have populations that are still in a precarious state. Just three years ago, the FWS concluded in a published rulemaking that they shouldn’t grant permits for longer than five years “because factors may change over a longer period of time such that a take authorized much earlier would later be incompatible with the preservation of the bald eagle or the golden eagle.” The underlying science has not changed, and there is no proven method for fixing a wind farm so that it no longer kills eagles, short of turning off the turbines,” said Fuller.
 
“FWS says that it has relatively little information about the impacts of wind energy on eagles, and yet, here they are proposing to extend the permit time for wind companies to kill them from five to 30 years, without having done the requisite environmental impact studies on the species. Conversely, FWS has provided pages of analysis of the potential financial impacts on industry by granting them three decades worth of legal cover to kill eagles,” Fuller said.
 
“This proposed rule is yet another example of the Interior Department’s misplaced priority in promoting one energy production method at the avoidable expense of our nation’s birds, bats, and other wildlife. We hope the American public loudly protests this move to give irresponsible wind developers a free pass to kill two of our most inspiring birds – Bald and Golden Eagles.” Fuller said.
 
In addition, today FWS announced the opening of a 90-day public comment period on the eagle take permit rules.  
 
For more information see:
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Comments

Legalizing Bird Kill is Rubbish and 30 years is just too Long!

The idea of actually allowing/legalizing killing a certain number of eagles/birds is unfathomable. They should be doing the exact opposite. To add to that, the agreement is for 30 years. I agree that existing efforts to balance the bird life offset will not be applicable in the next years. How much more 30 years from now!

Visit the website, Auto Insurance Claim Advice, for evaluations on personal injury settlements and damages.

For a variety of

For a variety of species--most of them protected--the death tolls from turbines are staggering. 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204781804577267114294838328.html

Remember also that for each 400+ foot wind turbine, a massive concrete foundation is laid. That means that the damage done by wind farms to these enormous wilderness areas--hundreds of thousands of acres--is irreparable; these are places slated for destruction.

And with the land naturally goes the plants and animals that live there. Many of them, like the ultra-sensitive, elusive Desert Bighorn (recently sighted in the Ocotillo area) have been struggling to make a come back. The turbines will do nothing less than seal their fate.

All this death and destruction, and for what?--a form of energy production so destructive, inefficient and expensive, that the only chance it stands of being built is as a government mandate--a Solyndra-style subsidy--a progressive experiment with a political payoff, the irony of which is multiplied a thousandfold by having been pushed through under the "green" label.

"Unconscionable," isn't a strong enough word to describe the motive behind these monstrosities.