Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version Share this




By Miriam Raftery

November 22, 2014 (Washington D.C.)—A two-year investigation by the Republican-controlled House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence has resulted in publication of a report   on November 21st. That report concludes that accusations made by Republican leaders over terrorist attacks on U.S. facilities in Benghazi, Libya are untrue.  The committee found no wrongdoing by any administration officials, and it concluded  that the CIA  and U.S. military acted appropriately before, during and after the Benghazi attacks that killed four Americans.

The following bullet points are direct quotes from the committee’s conclusions:

  • The CIA ensured sufficient security for CIA facilities in Benghazi and, without a requirement to do so, ably and bravely assisted the State Department on the night of the attacks. Their actions saved lives.
  • Appropriate U.S. personnel made reasonable tactical decisions that night, and the Committee found no evidence that there was either a stand-down order or a denial of available air support.
  • There was no intelligence failure prior to the attacks.
  • A mixed group of individuals, including those affiliated with Al-Qa’ida, participated in the attacks on U.S. facilities in Benghazi, although the committee finds that the intelligence was and remains conflicting about the identities, affiliations, and motivations of the attackers.
  • The Committee found no evidence that any officer was intimidated, wrongly forced to sign a nondisclosure agreement or otherwise kept from speaking to Congress…The Committee also found no evidence that the CIA conducted unauthorized activities in Benghazi and no evidence that the IC shipped arms to Syria.

The investigation did find that security was overwhelmed by the attackers at the State Department facility where two diplomats were killed.

The Committee’s investigation found that contradictory intelligence reports led to the CIA’s initial incorrect assessment that the attacks arose out of a protest in Benghazi. The CIA corrected its initial assessment after closed caption television footage became available a week after the September 11, 2012 attacks—two days after  then-Ambassador Susan Rice spoke publicly on the matter, and after FBI interviews with officials on the ground in Libya were published September 22.  Mistakes in talking points provided to Rice were due to conflicting intelligence  from multiple agencies, based on information available at the time—not due to any errors made by Rice or the Obama administration.

The report confirms many findings of six prior investigation by Congressional committees and a panel appointed by the State Department. 

Associated Press and others have reported that the Intelligence committee’s report firmly “debunks” numerous alse claims by Republican leaders who had sought to discredit the Obama administration and then-Secretary of State Hilary Clinton (a likely presidential candidate) over their handling of the attacks. Democrats have long contended that the repeated Republican-led probes were politically motiviated, yet now the Republican-controlled Intelligence Committee has failed to find merit to the allegations raised.

As for accountability over the attacks, a Libyan militant extremist, Ahmed Abu Khatalia,  was captured in Libya and extradited to the U.S., where he will stand trial on murder charges in the Benghazi killings. 

The House Intelligence committee report, made after two years of intensive investigation, states in the conclusion that it is meant to serve as “the definitive House statement on the intelligence community’s activities before, during, and after” the Benghazi attacks.

Error message

Support community news in the public interest! As nonprofit news, we rely on donations from the public to fund our reporting -- not special interests. Please donate to sustain East County Magazine's local reporting and/or wildfire alerts at to help us keep people safe and informed across our region.


Many Republicans are just as

Many Republicans are just as eager as Dems to cover their butts.

It's a coverup

Ambassador Chris Stevens in a previous assignment had worked with Islamist terrorists to overthrow Gaddafi. In September 2012 the new US-allied Libya leaders were just getting established in Tripoli. It was an important time, just after the illegal US regime change with Hillary's "We came, we saw, he died" comment about the death of a US ally. Nevertheless, Stevens traveled to Europe, first to Stuttgart, the home of the Pentagon's Africa Command, and then two days in Vienna, a city containing many UN and intelligence agencies. Upon Stevens' return to Libya at this important time, did Stevens take a role in getting the new government established with all the necessary US support? No, instead Stevens traveled to far-off Benghazi, with its CIA cell of 28 people, "to be present at a September 11 ceremony establishing a new American Corner at a local Benghazi school" according to the House Intelligence Report. Does anyone seriously believe that BS? And so on. It's a coverup, with other aspects I won't go into, like arms shipments from Benghazi to Syria via Turkey. What they should be investigating is the folly of the US exceeding the UN resolution regarding Libya and going for a regime change that destabilized the whole of North Africa, including Libya which is now a failed state. Gaddafi was keeping a lid on these militants which Stevens used to unseat and kill him (Gaddafi), people that then turned on Stevens himself. House Intelligence Committee, hah. They are a joke, as Senator Graham has said today using colorful language.